Chief’s Counsel: How FLSA Changes Affect Police Departments

This column was originally written before the November 2016 injunction referenced herein was issued, so some last-minute modifications have been made to the content. However, it contains valuable information and recommendations for chiefs, regardless of the final outcome of the court case.

On November 22, 2016, a Texas federal district court judge issued a U.S.-wide injunction to stop the implementation of the new Department of Labor (DOL) overtime rule. The rule, which was set to take effect on December 1, 2016, would have made overtime pay available to an estimated additional 4 million workers across the United States by increasing the salary threshold for those eligible for the overtime exemptions from $23,660 to $47,476.

Unless (or until) the injunction is lifted, the proposed rule will not go into effect. It is possible that the incoming Trump administration will take a different stand on the issue and might not pursue an appeal at all or might suggest some modifications to the proposed rule.

Read More
Chief's Counsel
Share
Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court, in District of Columbia v. Wesby, overturned a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia and held that the officers had probable cause t...
Chief's Counsel
Share
Officer Verdugo had just marked his second year on the job when he fatally shot a man charging at him with a kitchen knife. A few days after the shooting, while the encounter was still raw in Officer ...
Chief's Counsel
Share
A frequent federal civil rights claim made against police officers is for deliberate indifference to the serious medical needs of someone in custody. Usually, the person involved in these claims has ...
Chief's Counsel
Share
The recording of police activity by members of the public is now such a commonplace occurrence that officers should assume that they are being recorded at all times while on duty. The recording of pol...
Chief's Counsel
Share
Police officers encounter many challenges during a patrol shift, and bystanders recording police activity with their ever-accessible smartphone cameras is one of those challenges. There are times when...
Chief's Counsel
Share
Whether in reality or simply by the eye test, peace officer duty–related health issues such as injury and disability claims seem to be an increasingly significant area of liability for police depart...
Chief's Counsel
Share
As U.S. Supreme Court Justice Alito noted in Birchfield v. North Dakota, “[d]runk drivers take a grisly toll on the Nation’s roads, claiming thousands of lives, injuring many more victims, and inf...
Chief's Counsel
Share
In a recent case, County of Los Angeles v. Mendez, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the “provocation rule” developed by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in 1994. The provocation rule provided ...
Chief's Counsel
Share
Just over two years ago, in 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in City & County of San Francisco, California v. Sheehan portended a potential shift in the court’s view on police use of fo...
Chief's Counsel
Share
In 1967, a U.S. Supreme Court decision in Garrity v. New Jersey established that requiring public employees to make potential self-incriminating statements under the threat of job termination constitu...