Chief’s Counsel: U.S. Supreme Court Sneak Peek: Top 10 Law Enforcement Cases to Be Decided in the Court’s October 2019–2020 Term

The U.S. Supreme Court’s October 2018 through June 2019 term began with only eight of the nine justices seated. Justice Brett Kavanaugh did not get confirmed and sworn in until October 6, 2018, and then, only a few months later, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s illness kept her off the bench for oral arguments in January. It wasn’t until February 2019 that the court consistently had all nine justices to hear oral arguments. This probably contributed to last session’s unusually slow pace in deciding cases and issuing opinions.

However, every chief should be reminded that, even if the subject of a court case is not technically a criminal justice matter, it can still impact law enforcement officers and staff in very profound ways. Therefore, it is critical for police leaders in the United States to stay abreast of all U.S. Supreme Court decisions—and, sometimes, it is even more important to know what criminal justice and other high-profile matters they have chosen to review. For example, this term is shaping up to be a block-buster term, as the court has already granted review in 50 cases, which is far more than it normally grants this early in the process. Cases on the docket involve very controversial issues such as the Second Amendment, sexual orientation discrimination in employment, the Affordable Care Act, and government aid to parochial schools. Considering that 2020 will include a U.S. presidential election, all law enforcement executives will have to be especially alert and ready to adjust policies and procedures that could be affected by upcoming decisions.

Read More
Investigations
Share
Failure to understand the distinction between so-called immigration warrants issued by an immigration judge or traditional arrest or search warrants issued by a federal court judge can lead to liabili...
Chief's Counsel
Share
For today’s police officers, the first sign of a serious threat increasingly appears not on a street corner or in a call for service, but on a screen. Posts, comments, livestreams, group chats, and ...
Chief's Counsel
Share
The practice of placing officers "on call" raises questions concerning a municipality’s obligation to pay officers, as well as the ability to restrict such officers’ activities while on an "on-cal...
Chief's Counsel
Share
In 2011, this author wrote an article for the Chief’s Counsel section of Police Chief magazine titled “Critical Incident Review Board: Creation and Refinement.” The purpose of the article was ...
Chief's Counsel
Share
Immigration enforcement in the United States is generally a civil matter, handled exclusively by federal agents working for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or Customs and Border Patrol....
Chief's Counsel
Share
Imagine this: a qualified applicant submits a résumé for a position in a department. Before anyone on the team lays eyes on it, an artificial intelligence (AI) system screens them out. No interview....
Chief's Counsel
Share
Words matter. The terms used to describe police work—law enforcement, public safety, guardian, protector, or warrior—do more than signal a philosophy. They define the profession’s purpose, s...
Chief's Counsel
Share
On May 15, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in Barnes v. Felix, fundamentally altering the legal evaluation of excessive force claims under the Fourth Amendment. The ruling reje...
Chief's Counsel
Share
In 2025, “pig butchering” does not necessarily result in pork chops and bacon. The term now describes a sophisticated cybercrime that combines long-term psychological manipulation with fraudulent ...
Chief's Counsel
Share
In light of the recent U.S. government actions related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), it is important for police leaders to be mindful of their ongoing obligations to comply with state and...