Chief’s Counsel: Law Enforcement and Persons with Mental Illness: New Standards for Safety

It is invaluable for law enforcement agencies to recognize and implement policies and procedures designed to help officers approach and interact with persons with mental illness in a way that maximizes the safety of the SUBJECT, officers, and community, as well as preventing liability and litigation. Law enforcement officers face people from all walks of life on a daily basis. Currently, 43.8 million adults in the United States have a mental illness. Of that, 10 million people are affected by serious mental illness resulting in “serious functional impairment.” Thus, it is highly likely that many of the people that officers come into contact with have a mental illness. Data show that 1 of 4 people killed in officer-involved shootings are affected by some mental or emotional distress. When one adds in persons with drug and alcohol addictions, officers are frequently encountering people with severe issues. Due to a lack of resources and support for people with mental illness, law enforcement has now become the de facto response. Agencies need to find new and better methods for interacting with this population, particularly related to the appropriate amount of force that is reasonable in the situations involving persons with mental illnesses.

Read More
Chief's Counsel
Share
The practice of placing officers "on call" raises questions concerning a municipality’s obligation to pay officers, as well as the ability to restrict such officers’ activities while on an "on-cal...
Chief's Counsel
Share
In 2011, this author wrote an article for the Chief’s Counsel section of Police Chief magazine titled “Critical Incident Review Board: Creation and Refinement.” The purpose of the article was ...
Chief's Counsel
Share
Immigration enforcement in the United States is generally a civil matter, handled exclusively by federal agents working for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or Customs and Border Patrol....
Chief's Counsel
Share
Imagine this: a qualified applicant submits a résumé for a position in a department. Before anyone on the team lays eyes on it, an artificial intelligence (AI) system screens them out. No interview....
Chief's Counsel
Share
Words matter. The terms used to describe police work—law enforcement, public safety, guardian, protector, or warrior—do more than signal a philosophy. They define the profession’s purpose, s...
Chief's Counsel
Share
On May 15, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in Barnes v. Felix, fundamentally altering the legal evaluation of excessive force claims under the Fourth Amendment. The ruling reje...
Chief's Counsel
Share
In 2025, “pig butchering” does not necessarily result in pork chops and bacon. The term now describes a sophisticated cybercrime that combines long-term psychological manipulation with fraudulent ...
Chief's Counsel
Share
In light of the recent U.S. government actions related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), it is important for police leaders to be mindful of their ongoing obligations to comply with state and...
Chief's Counsel
Share
Facial recognition technology (FRT) emerged 50 years ago from experiments that measured facial attributes to search for matches on a semi-automated system.1 Modern FRT is an electronic system that us...
Chief's Counsel
Share
The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution requires that criminal defense attorneys provide a minimum quality of service to their clients.1 The attorney need not be perfect but must at least be com...