Chief’s Counsel: The Considerations and Risks of Personal Communication Devices

Technology and its use in the workplace is a topic that is (and should be) often discussed and considered by professionals in all fields, including law enforcement. The recent news coverage regarding former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of private email accounts for official government business highlights several issues and serves as a reminder that the use of personal communication devices (PCDs) in the workplace requires particular attention.1

There are a variety of ways agencies currently handle PCDs in the workplace. Some agencies provide these devices to their employees, while others expect officers to use their own devices and may provide a stipend or reimburse employees for work-related use. Some agencies may prohibit officers from using their own PCDs for public business. Still others do not clearly define their expectations, which is a recipe for disaster. The use of PCDs such as smartphones and tablets for law enforcement business raises legal, safety, liability, and public perception issues. Agencies need to carefully consider each of these issues and clearly define their expectations to their members and to the public.

Read More
Chief's Counsel
Share
Lawyers play a critical role in policing. The benefits an attorney brings to a police agency extend far beyond defending officers in civil suits. Agency lawyers can be vital to every facet of the prof...
Chief's Counsel
Share
Much avoidable policing liability does not begin with bad intent. It begins with answering the wrong question.    Officers, supervisors, and chiefs are often asked after the fact to explain why...
Chief's Counsel
Share
Police officers are intimately familiar with the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.1 The terms contained in that amendment—and how judges interpret those terms—dictate how officer...
Investigations
Share
Failure to understand the distinction between so-called immigration warrants issued by an immigration judge or traditional arrest or search warrants issued by a federal court judge can lead to liabili...
Chief's Counsel
Share
For today’s police officers, the first sign of a serious threat increasingly appears not on a street corner or in a call for service, but on a screen. Posts, comments, livestreams, group chats, and ...
Chief's Counsel
Share
The practice of placing officers "on call" raises questions concerning a municipality’s obligation to pay officers, as well as the ability to restrict such officers’ activities while on an "on-cal...
Chief's Counsel
Share
In 2011, this author wrote an article for the Chief’s Counsel section of Police Chief magazine titled “Critical Incident Review Board: Creation and Refinement.” The purpose of the article was ...
Chief's Counsel
Share
Immigration enforcement in the United States is generally a civil matter, handled exclusively by federal agents working for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or Customs and Border Patrol....
Chief's Counsel
Share
Imagine this: a qualified applicant submits a résumé for a position in a department. Before anyone on the team lays eyes on it, an artificial intelligence (AI) system screens them out. No interview....
Chief's Counsel
Share
Words matter. The terms used to describe police work—law enforcement, public safety, guardian, protector, or warrior—do more than signal a philosophy. They define the profession’s purpose, s...