Chief’s Counsel: Challenges to DEI Programs in Policing

In light of the recent U.S. government actions related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), it is important for police leaders to be mindful of their ongoing obligations to comply with state and federal employment and anti-discrimination laws. Based on the June 5 decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. police executives should review their employment practices and policies, including their employee handbooks, rules and regulations, and policies and procedures to ensure that they are in conformance with applicable state and federal anti-discrimination laws.

The Supreme Court’s decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services is expected to have a significant impact on DEI programs in police departments and other organizations by making it easier for individuals to sue for reverse discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.1 This change could lead to an increase in reverse discrimination lawsuits challenging DEI initiatives, as plaintiffs will now face a lower bar to initiate such claims.

 

In order to access the rest of the article sign in with your IACP or Subscriber credentials.

Read More
Chief's Counsel
Share
The practice of placing officers "on call" raises questions concerning a municipality’s obligation to pay officers, as well as the ability to restrict such officers’ activities while on an "on-cal...
Chief's Counsel
Share
In 2011, this author wrote an article for the Chief’s Counsel section of Police Chief magazine titled “Critical Incident Review Board: Creation and Refinement.” The purpose of the article was ...
Chief's Counsel
Share
Immigration enforcement in the United States is generally a civil matter, handled exclusively by federal agents working for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or Customs and Border Patrol....
Chief's Counsel
Share
Imagine this: a qualified applicant submits a résumé for a position in a department. Before anyone on the team lays eyes on it, an artificial intelligence (AI) system screens them out. No interview....
Chief's Counsel
Share
Words matter. The terms used to describe police work—law enforcement, public safety, guardian, protector, or warrior—do more than signal a philosophy. They define the profession’s purpose, s...
Chief's Counsel
Share
On May 15, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in Barnes v. Felix, fundamentally altering the legal evaluation of excessive force claims under the Fourth Amendment. The ruling reje...
Chief's Counsel
Share
In 2025, “pig butchering” does not necessarily result in pork chops and bacon. The term now describes a sophisticated cybercrime that combines long-term psychological manipulation with fraudulent ...
Chief's Counsel
Share
In light of the recent U.S. government actions related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), it is important for police leaders to be mindful of their ongoing obligations to comply with state and...
Chief's Counsel
Share
Facial recognition technology (FRT) emerged 50 years ago from experiments that measured facial attributes to search for matches on a semi-automated system.1 Modern FRT is an electronic system that us...
Chief's Counsel
Share
The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution requires that criminal defense attorneys provide a minimum quality of service to their clients.1 The attorney need not be perfect but must at least be com...