Corporations have long faced a spectrum of complex risks. From cyberattacks to geopolitical challenges, the speed and depth of crises handled by security teams have increased dramatically in recent years. Adding to this reality, organizations must contend with an accelerating and highly dangerous phenomena: targeted violence committed by individuals whose motivations are complex, deeply personal, and often ideologically charged. These actors may be current or former employees, clients, or customers, as well as external radicalized lone offenders seeking revenge, notoriety, or a sense of purpose.

The challenge for corporate security professionals is not only to detect and deter these threats in environments in which public-private boundaries blur and emotions run high but also, in many cases, to rapidly establish coordination with the police. The handoff between private-sector security teams and public agencies, no matter how critical, is fraught with challenges. Privacy and data localization regulations, disclosure obligations, and the often cross-jurisdictional nature of these threats require a careful and collaborative approach between the police and corporate security. As the threat landscape evolves, so too must the relationships that underpin effective prevention.

A Complex Landscape

The extremist landscape has become increasingly fragmented in recent years. More sophisticated groups have been degraded by police actions and internal fractures, resulting in a proliferation of small-group and lone offenders. This has been accompanied by a similar fragmentation in actors’ motivations. To the extent that these motivations are known, many perpetrators of recent high-profile political violence have shown a mix of traditionally right-wing and left-wing views that they have combined with personal grievances and conspiracy theories. Anti-corporate ideologies are pervasive across the political spectrum, while some extreme online communities from which threat actors have emerged (e.g., the “black pill” ideology) are not easily placed along a traditional political spectrum.

In order to access the rest of the article sign in with your IACP or Subscriber credentials.